Think 24/7 Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the Think 24/7 Content Network

2. List of New Testament verses not included in modern English ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament...

   Most translations follow KJV (based on Textus Receptus) versification and have Romans 16:25–27 and Romans 14:24–26 do not exist. The WEB bible, however, moves Romans 16:25–27 (end of chapter verses) to Romans 14:24–26 (also end of chapter verses). WEB explains with a footnote in Romans 16:

3. Textual variants in the First Epistle of John - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

   Textual variants in the First Epistle of John are the subject of the study called textual criticism of the New Testament. Textual variants in manuscripts arise when a copyist makes deliberate or inadvertent alterations to a text that is being reproduced. An abbreviated list of textual variants in this particular book is given in this article below.

4. Textual variants in the Gospel of John - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

   John 4:9 ου γαρ συγχρωνται Ιουδαιοι Σαμαριταις (for Jews have no association with Samaritans) omitted by א* D it a,b,d, e, j cop fay. John 4:37 Verse omitted in 𝔓 75. John 4:42 ο χριστος (the Christ) – A C 3 D L X supp Δ Θ Ψ 0141 f 1,13 33 565 579 1071 Byz it mss syr p,h cop bo mss

5. First Epistle of John - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Epistle_of_John

   The end part of the Second Epistle of Peter (3:16–18) and the beginning of the First Epistle of John (1:1–2:9) on the same page of Codex Alexandrinus (AD 400–440) 1 John 4:11-12, 14–17 in Papyrus 9 (P. Oxy. 402; 3rd century) The earliest written versions of the epistle have been lost; some of the earliest surviving manuscripts include ...

6. An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Historical_Account_of...

   The account claimed to review the textual evidence available [2] from ancient sources on two disputed Bible passages: 1 John 5:7 and 1 Timothy 3:16. Newton describes this letter as "an account of what the reading has been in all ages, and what steps it has been changed, as far as I can hitherto determine by records", [ 3 ] and "a criticism ...

7. Green's Literal Translation - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green's_Literal_Translation

   Green's Literal Translation or the Literal Translation of the Holy Bible (LITV) is a translation of the Bible by Jay P. Green Sr., first published in 1985. [1] The LITV takes a literal, formal equivalence approach to translation. The Masoretic Text is used as the Hebrew basis for the Old Testament, and the Textus Receptus is used as the Greek ...