Search results
Results from the Think 24/7 Content Network
Logical reasoning is concerned with the correctness of arguments. A key distinction is between deductive and non-deductive arguments. Logical reasoning is a mental activity that aims to arrive at a conclusion in a rigorous way. It happens in the form of inferences or arguments by starting from a set of premises and reasoning to a conclusion ...
Naturalistic fallacy – inferring evaluative conclusions from purely factual premises [102] [103] in violation of fact-value distinction. Naturalistic fallacy (sometimes confused with appeal to nature) is the inverse of moralistic fallacy. Is–ought fallacy [104] – deduce a conclusion about what ought to be, on the basis of what is.
A faulty generalization is an informal fallacy wherein a conclusion is drawn about all or many instances of a phenomenon on the basis of one or a few instances of that phenomenon. It is similar to a proof by example in mathematics. [1] It is an example of jumping to conclusions. [2] For example, one may generalize about all people or all ...
This paper adds to the literature in this field by demonstrating how to scaffold IRAC (issue, rule, application, and conclusion) for first year Law students and use criterion-referenced assessment to assess the application of IRAC to a problem-based question. IRAC is one of many acronyms commonly used to teach “legal reasoning” and thus ...
Long Scenario – Bus Accident. Module 1: Introduction. Students and staff of the school’s basketball team are on the way home from an away game several counties over when the bus is involved in an accident with another vehicle. The school bus is carrying 30 students and staff members at the time of the accident.
The essays became, in effect, dramatic scenes exemplifying the ideas. hypothesized and substantiated by earlier research. A draft of each essay. was reviewed by at least one practitioner, usually an elementary or. secondary classroom teacher. The first 6ublished versions of these essays appeared in June 1983 as a
Sample writing strategies for the planning component of the writing process . . 9. Example 1. 2b. Sample writing strategies for the goal setting component of the writing process . . 11. Example 1. 2c. Sample writing strategies for the drafting component of the writing process . . . 12. Example 1. 2d
generating codes and themes. To demonstrate the utility of the inquiry framework, examples from an exploratory research project are articulated. The examples are intended to guide the researcher by offering evidence of the interconnected practices and by illustrating the stages involved in the data collection and thematic analysis. In